Reviewers are chosen based on their subject expertise and experience relevant to the manuscript’s topic. Reviewers are expected to conduct evaluations constructively, highlighting both strengths and areas for improvement, and suggesting actionable feedback.

Reviews are collegial, respectful, and focused on academic merit and methodological rigor.

All manuscripts and related correspondence must be treated as confidential. Reviewers do not share, copy, or discuss manuscripts with third parties during the review process.

Reviewers would declare any conflicts of interest to the editorial team immediately upon receipt of the manuscript.

Reviewers should assess the following aspects:

• Title and Abstract: Clarity, relevance, and alignment with the manuscript
• Introduction and Problem Statement: Clear articulation of research questions or
• Literature Review: Depth, relevance, and use of current and credible
• Methodology: Appropriateness, rigor, and transparency of methods
• Results and Analysis: Validity, clarity, and relevance of
• Discussion and Conclusion: Interpretation of results, significance, and contribution to the
• Writing Quality: Organisation, clarity, grammar, and adherence to ethical
• Relevance to Mental Health: Contribution to mental health research, practice, or education, in line with WeAvecU’s mission.

At the end of the review, reviewers recommend one of the following actions:

• Accept (publish as is)
• Revisions required (minor or moderate)
• Resubmit for review (major revision required)
• Reject (not suitable for publication)
• Submit elsewhere (if outside the scope of the journal)